Dear All
On a regular basis I get the follwoing messages from ISA.
Subject: ISA Server alert: An intrusion was attempted by an external user.
Message Body: ISA Server name: WHATEVER
ISA Server detected an all port scan attack from Internet Protocol (IP) address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
There is an associated Event Log report
Event Type: Warning Event Source: Microsoft Firewall Event Category: Packet filter Event ID: 15105 Date: 21/10/2006 Time: 07:36:12 User: N/A Computer: WHATEVER Description: ISA Server detected an all port scan attack from Internet Protocol (IP) address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.
I get these regularly. They are from a small group of IP addresses and I am happy that it is not an actual attack.
ISA Server detected an all port scan attack from Internet Protocol (IP) address 209.213.108.135.
This will also occur during the time they are playing. The IP address is registered in DNS as belonging to club penguin. I have also received a similar "attack" when they have played a certain game in Neopets and I have received it once when I did something with my online banker.
Each time a DNS lookup on the IP address has provided me with enough assurance that I am not being attacked.
I believe it has something to do with the sites attempting to find a free port to set up a connection to play the game or allow my connectivity to the site application. I also believe it is to do with the java apps they are using.
What I would like to know is how I tell ISA that if an intrusion "all port scan" is detected from certain IP addresses, then do not report. I do not want to turn off Intrusion Detection just to stop getting these false positives by email.
I have looked at the General config under Configuration, but here all I can do is turn off specific attack types.
I have looked at the alert definitions in Monitoring, but they allow me to set up the alerts should the event happen but not filter which IP addresses are allowed to "scan" me.
Is there a policy I can create that will let these selected IP addresses connect to my internal clients without causing a false positive??
|